By bent, I obviously mean "crooked".

Perhaps one day I will open a newspaper and read an article about how a disgruntled player hunts down and murders a player infamously known for griefing.

Erotica1 is, with malice, willful forethought and intent, extorting/blackmailing victims OUTSIDE OF THE GAME by holding their INGAME items ransom

To those arguing that the assets are owned by CCP, then it falls incumbent on CCP to press charges on Erotica1 for ransoming their ingame proprietary property against an individual who has paid CCPfor use of them, by means of extortion/blackmail occuring OUTSIDE of thee game.

Only about 1.1 billion.

EDIT: Also, he wasn't scammed. He quit the bonus round and forfeited his ISK.

Well yeah, I think he goes way over the line of decent behavior. Having said that: how bloody stupid do you have to be to engage in his bonus room thingy?

-º 11.443 Harassment.
A person commits a petty misdemeanor if, with purpose to harass another, he or she:
(a) Makes a telephone call without purpose or legitimate communication; or
(b) Insults, taunts or challenges another in a manner likely to provoke violent or disorderly response; or
(c) Makes repeated communications anonymously or at extremely inconvenient hours, or in offensively coarse language; or
(d) Subjects another to an offensive touching; or
(e) Engages in any other course of alarming conduct serving no legitimate purpose.

Again: how much isk was scammed out of that guy?

Let me see if I can construct an analogy that is reasonably relevant and accurate to this:

---

You are in a casino.
You hold in your possession a stack of the casino's chips.
You are entitled to use these chips, though they nominally actually belong to the casino establishment.

In the course of your activities in the casino, you are approached by a shady individual offering to double your casino chips.
You are such an idiot, that you believe this claim, and hand over your chips to the guy.
He is now, legitimately, holding your chips. You gave them to him. Sucks to be you.

This part of the story ends there, and represents the initial ingame events.
So far, this is all kosher and legit. No problems.

---

The next part represents what happens OUT of the game, and is far harder to model on the analogy, but Ill try:

The same guy you gave your chips to, who is now holding your chips in HIS pocket, now informs you that in order for the rest of the your doubling to occur, you have to follow him out of the casino establishment, and into a dark alley.

This presents a real problem for you.
He is now legitimately holding your chips. You gave them to him. They are in his pocket.
You have no direct recourse to re-aquiring the chips, except to comply and follow him down that dark alley.
The only way that you can get them back, or have even a hope of getting them back, is to do as he says.

At this point you can either decline, and lose everything, or comply, in the hope that atleast you can get back your own stack of chips and the earlier latent promise of him doubling them is still being offered as an incentive.

The casino, however, does not allow customers to take their chips outside of the establishment.
So the other man deposits your chips, out of his pocket, at the casino door.

You then both leave environment that is the casino, as an establishment with its own set rules of conduct and security on its premises.

You follow him until eventually you reach a dark alley.

There, other shady men appear, and together, they begin demanding that you perform humiliating and demeaning tasks if you ever want to see your chips again. This continues for a full 2hrs and, because your wife is worried where you got to, she finds you in the alley with these men, being demanded to perform these humiliating tasks for return of your chips.

The men also record the entire activity for purposes of sharing with their "friends", for enjoyment.

All of this happened outside the casino, and the chips are still back in the casino.
They are still OWNED by the casino. The casinos rules have not changed in the meantime.

---

Now onto the part of what should happen now:

Now, it is informed to the casino staff that there is somebody going around on their business premises offering to double the chips of other clients, pocketing those chips from them, and then taking the victims down a dark alley for 2hrs of recorded humiliation and demeaning on the false promise of returning those chips to them (which dont actually belong to either of the participants).

I, as the casino manager, upon hearing this, immediately blackball and exclude the shady people from ever doing this to my customers again. I do it for the protection of my customers, for the protection of my chips and for the protection of the reputation of my establishment.

Anyways, was worth an attempt. Take from it what you will.

At the point the recording begins, Erotica1 already has the entirety of the victims assets.

The sole and only purpose of the subsequent entire 2hrs torment, is to humiliate and grief the victim.
That is malice.

At what point in the recording does the victim sing?

*Trying to derail thread into gender war*

Absolutely despicable and clear case of cyber-bullying.

Predating on the EVE player base for purposes of exploiting them in an OUT OF GAME "Bonus Room" however, is very against the EULA.

I am under the understanding that Ero always gets consent to broadcast the conversations. Just checked, after the first minute Ero clearly states that the conversation is being recorded and refers to an earlier conversation regarding the matter. It seems he didn't miss that important point this time.

How and from where was Sohkar sourced into the TS3?

Im putting money on Salvos being Sohkars "wife" actually.

You should be the first against the wall, for sharing that abomination of cancer.
YOU THINK THIS IS A GAME?

They are back somewhere in this 100 page monstrosity.

There is nothing illegal about his ingame activities.
There is a great deal illegal about him extending those activities to outside of the game, on false premise.
And a great deal relating to that, that CCP should imo take very seriously.

In EVE, fine.
Out of EVE, Id take the case if I could.

@Chaka: This isnt about the items. Those he has already legitimately aquired, before the out of game illegitimacy begins.

Fourth attempt:

Ok mate. Let's talk like adults. Concerning self-reflection, do you think you and your friends have gone too far?

As far as im aware bonus room makes no attempt to let the victim know they are being recorded at the start.

There might be a recording somewhere of someone doing something potentially illegal on a teamspeak server somewhere - prove me wrong

No doubt! But I meant on the part of the listeners.

Just out of curiosity, do you think that 3rd parties have a right to record your telephone conversations without your consent?

Would that 3rd party not vphave to confirm consent from you and the pereon you are calling in order to do so?

1) There is no evidence that the victim is even in the channel at the time it is said.
2) There is no evidence that the victim even hears that being said.
3) There is no expression of consent on the part of the victim to being recorded.
4) There is no implied consent on the part of the victim for being recorded, because it is not specifically stated by the recorder.
5) There is no expression of consent to distribution of the recording.